q4 financial

How a second opinion saved a business owner over $100,000 – a Tax and Accounting Case Study

A routine consultation turned into a financial breakthrough

When Daniel, the son-in-law of a long-standing client, approached us for advice, he was looking for guidance on transitioning a long-term employee into a partnership in his business. What started as a straightforward consultation quickly became a transformative moment for Daniel’s financial future.

The initial review

Our process began with a comprehensive financial intake, including:

✔ Business financials
✔ Personal income tax returns
✔ A full review of Daniel’s family’s net financial position, debts, and interest rates

We quickly identified a critical issue: Daniel’s most recent two years of financial statements and tax returns had been prepared but not lodged.
 While this may have seemed like a minor oversight, it turned out to be a fortunate delay—one that saved him a significant sum.

Identifying the problem: An $80,000 tax mistake

A deeper analysis revealed a critical issue: Daniel’s accountant had completed his compliance documents without proper tax optimisation. If filed as prepared, these returns would have resulted in:

🚨 Over $80,000 in unnecessary tax payments due to non-optimal income structuring and shareholder distributions

Kelly Hill, Director at q4 financial working with a client

Delivering the solution

Using our in-depth knowledge of taxation and corporate structuring, we:

Restructured Daniel’s tax returns, ensuring compliance while optimising his financial position
Achieved over $80,000 in tax savings
Secured thousands of dollars in additional family tax benefits
Reduced Division 293 tax liabilities, significantly lowering his additional tax obligations

As a result, Daniel and his family were thrilled with the outcome. The $100,000 + savings we secured effectively covered our fees for the next decade—a true win-win.

Uncovering Additional Issues

Our review didn’t stop there. While analysing Daniel’s books, we uncovered another costly error—his independent bookkeeper and accountant had incorrectly categorised his business income as subject to GST.

The Impact:

🚨 Daniel had been overpaying 10% of his income to the Australian Tax Office (ATO).

We immediately began rectifying this issue and are now working with the ATO to recover as many years of overpayments as possible

The takeaway: A second opinion matters

Daniel’s case is a powerful reminder that compliance is not the same as strategy. Filing your tax returns is one thing—optimising them is another.

What would an extra $100K mean to you? Don't leave money on the table. Reach out to us now for a second opinion.

Join our email list

Download The 10-Point Business Exit Blueprint - Whether you're planning to sell your business, pass it on, or simply secure your financial future, this blueprint gives you the clarity and strategy you need.

Enter your email below to get your free copy now!

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.